A MedTech startup used Faster Cashflow’s 60-month model to determine funding gaps and confidently pursue two device programs in parallel.
COO | Pre-Revenue MedTech Startup
(R&D heavy, multi-year FDA pathway)
The company raised capital to develop one device — but a second high-value opportunity emerged. Leadership didn’t know whether current funding could support both projects or whether pursuing both would compress runway beyond safe limits. A wrong decision risked missed milestones, stalled timelines, and investor concern.
No integrated model linking R&D, regulatory, hiring, and cashflow
Runway estimates based on rough averages rather than forecasted burn
No scenario planning for delays (common in MedTech)
What We Did
Built a detailed 60-month, three-statement financial model
Modeled each device program independently and together
Integrated FDA, R&D, engineering, and hiring timelines
Created best/worst-case scenarios for schedule and cost changes
Identified the precise funding gap and optimal timing for raising a round
Results
Testimonials
We had raised capital to develop our first device but discovered a second opportunity. We didn’t know if we could afford to run both programs in parallel. Faster Cashflow built a 60-month model that clarified our true burn, our funding gap, and the right timing for our next raise. We made a confident decision backed by real financial insight.
COO, Pre-Revenue MedTech Startup
